Archived article
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
Lockheed Martin’s Q2 clues to US defence spending regime

AJ Bell is an easy to use, award-winning platform Open an account
We've accounts to suit every investing need, and free guides and special offers to help you get the most from them.
You can get a few handy suggestions, or even get our experts to do the hard work for you – by picking one of our simple investment ideas.
All the resources you need to choose your shares, from market data to the latest investment news and analysis.
Funds offer an easier way to build your portfolio – we’ve got everything you need to choose the right one.
Starting to save for a pension, approaching retirement, or after an explainer on pension jargon? We can help.
Please note that tax, investment, pension and ISA rules can change and the information and any views contained in this article may now be inaccurate.
If the global defence sector is undergoing a paradigm shift driven by geopolitical tensions and technological innovation, Wall Street-listed Lockheed Martin (LMT:NYSE) is a critical player, not that you would have guessed so by recent share price performance.
While European defence firms like Babcock (BAB) and BAE Systems (BA.) have been going gangbusters in 2025, Lockheed is down 3% year to date in spite of record US defence budgets. Compare that to the VanEck Defence (DFNG), the UK’s biggest sector-themed ETF, which has rallied 42% this year. Even by the standards of its US peer group Lockheed has been poor, with rivals RTX (RTX:NYSE) and Northrop Grumman (NOC:NYSE) up 26% and 10% respectively so far in 2025.
Quite why is a bit of a mystery, as we head towards second quarter earnings (22 July, the same day as its two peers, interestingly). True, much of Europe’s defence rally comes from US political pressure for nations like the UK, Germany and France, to close the defence spending gap (currently 1.9% to 2.3%) towards the US’s 3.4% of GDP and beyond.
First-quarter revenue and earnings beat analyst expectations in April, growth and margins were typically robust and there is some excitement around Lockheed’s Conventional Prompt Strike programme, a ground-based hypersonic missile system, to act as an important growth catalyst going forward.
Execution may be the perceived sticking point, and whether Q2 results will underscore its strategic positioning to capitalise on a decade of modernisation or face the slowing of growth through the second half of the year, as many analysts appear to predict, based on Koyfin consensus data.
QUARTERLY RESULTS
18 July: 3M, American Express, Charles Schwab, Schlumberger, Truist Financial
21 July: Domino’s Pizza, NXP, Roper Technologies, Verizon
22 July: Baker Hughes, Capital One Financial, Chubb, Coca Cola, Danaher, Equifax, General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Philip Morris, Texas Instruments
23 July: AT&T, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Freeport-McMoran, General Dynamics, Hasbro, Hilton Worldwide, IBM, Moody’s, Raymond James Financial, Rollins, ServiceNow, Tesla, Thermo Fisher Scientific
24 July: Blackstone, Dow, First Solar, Honeywell, Intel, Keurig Dr Pepper, Mastercard, Nasdaq, VeriSign
These articles are provided by Shares magazine which is published by AJ Bell Media, a part of AJ Bell. Shares is not written by AJ Bell.
Shares is provided for your general information and use and is not a personal recommendation to invest. It is not intended to be relied upon by you in making or not making any investment decisions. The investments referred to in these articles will not be suitable for all investors. If in doubt please seek appropriate independent financial advice.
Investors acting on the information in these articles do so at their own risk and AJ Bell Media and its staff do not accept liability for losses suffered by investors as a result of their investment decisions.
The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested. We don't offer advice, so it's important you understand the risks, if you're unsure please consult a suitably qualified financial adviser. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and rules may change. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.